Who publishes Client Work HQ
Client Work HQ is published by the Workspace369 team, led by Szymon Dziak, Workspace369’s founder and software developer. Our perspective comes from building client-management software. It is an interested perspective, which is why the ownership disclosure appears on our recommendations.
See Szymon’s public developer profile and Workspace369. The Client Work HQ byline identifies the publishing team; it does not claim that every guide has received a separate independent review.
What you’ll find here
Client Work HQ covers CRM software and the tools around it: proposals, invoicing, client portals, project management, scheduling and automation. Our audience is freelancers, small agencies, consultants and creative client businesses.
Every guide has a companion video on our YouTube channel. The article gives you a place to compare plans, follow source links and come back to a buying checklist. The video walks through the story and illustrates the workflow.
Our relationship with Workspace369
Our #1 pick is Workspace369, and we make it.
Client Work HQ is operated by the people who make Workspace369. That relationship shapes our point of view, and we disclose it on our guides and videos. Our recommendations are editorial opinions based on the fit we explain, not universal rankings.
We also cover competing tools and explain where their focus makes sense. A dedicated sales team, a solo creative and an hourly consultancy may reasonably choose different software.
How we put a guide together
- Start with the workflow. We use specific client-work scenarios, such as an inquiry becoming a proposal, an invoice or an assigned project.
- Check the source. We use vendor pricing pages, help documentation and product information. We identify billing intervals and seat assumptions when comparing costs.
- Explain the tradeoff. A buying guide should tell you why a tool fits and which plan contains the relevant feature.
- Keep the evidence visible. We link sources and show when the research was updated. We correct material errors when identified.
AI assistance and evidence
AI tools assist with research organization, drafting, editing and video production. The evidence for a product claim is the linked vendor documentation or verified product behavior, rather than an AI-generated answer. Our comparison cards distinguish source facts from our editorial judgment about fit.
Our trial worksheets are instructions for your own evaluation. They are not reports of tests we have performed. When we publish a hands-on test, we will identify the scenario, plan, date, observations and supporting evidence.
What our videos demonstrate
Workspace369 scenes use animated recreations of the product interface and demonstration data. They illustrate workflows; they are not recordings of real customer accounts. Competitor coverage draws on the sources cited in each guide. We do not describe a comparison as a hands-on test unless we have actually performed and documented one.
Review and update policy
Pricing and plan gates are checked when a guide is published or materially updated. We target a monthly review of pricing-heavy guides and recheck sooner when an official source changes or a correction is received. The visible source date tells you when a fact was checked; a new build alone does not refresh that date.
Prices and updates
Software changes. A price or plan in an older video may differ from the vendor’s current offer. Articles show their research update date and link to current official pricing. Figures in worked examples are illustrations with stated assumptions, not promised savings.
Corrections
Send a correction to support@workspace369.com with the article URL, the detail in question and an official source. You can also leave a comment on the corresponding Client Work HQ video. Material corrections are recorded in the article's update notes.